The Feds support shipbuilding but compared to marijuana which of these two industries contribute more to the economy.
In recent months, the current presidential administration has made shipbuilding a visible national priority, citing economic security, defense readiness, and the need to rebuild American industrial capacity. Federal speeches, policy directives, and funding discussions have elevated shipbuilding as a symbol of manufacturing revival. At the same time, the cannabis industry continues to receive cautious, uneven federal attention. While it has moved forward on rescheduling, Mmarijuana remains illegal at the federal level. Reform legislation advances slowly despite strong public support. The contrast between robust federal backing for shipbuilding and the tepid, uncertain approach toward cannabis shapes a broader debate over which of these two industries contribute more to the economy?
RELATED: What Does Cannabis Rescheduling Mean
Measured purely by scale, the two industries look very different. U.S. shipbuilding today is a relatively small and highly specialized sector. The country currently produces roughly three large commercial ships per year, with shipyards concentrated in a handful of coastal states. According to commonly cited labor estimates, including those referenced by industry analysts and public employment data, the average shipbuilding salary is about $59,000 annually. While some skilled welders, engineers, and managers earn more, an average reflecting a workforce closer to the national median wage than many assume.
The cannabis industry, by contrast, operates at far greater scale. Legal marijuana supports more than 400,000 jobs nationwide across cultivation, manufacturing, retail, compliance, logistics, and technology. Industry revenues exceed $30 billion annually, with legal sales spread across more than half the states. Average wages vary widely, but many full-time cannabis workers earn salaries comparable to shipbuilding employees, particularly in regulated states with established markets.
One of the most important economic differences is time. Even with full federal support, shipbuilding cannot expand quickly. Building new shipyards, modernizing facilities, training skilled labor, and securing supply chains takes years, often decades. Workforce pipelines require long-term investment in apprenticeships and technical education, and new production capacity cannot be switched on quickly. Economic benefits from expanded shipbuilding, while real, will be gradual and regionally concentrated.
Cannabis growth follows a very different pattern. Because the industry is already operating in dozens of states, economic expansion can happen rapidly when regulations change. New licenses, retail stores, and cultivation sites can open in months, not years. Tax revenue flows immediately once sales begin, and employment grows alongside local demand. This speed matters at a time when states are looking for near-term economic relief and job creation.
RELATED: Who Is Rep. Andy Harris And Why Does He Hate Cannabis
Another key distinction is ownership. Shipbuilding is dominated by large contractors and defense-linked firms. Cannabis, on the other hand, has supported thousands of small and mid-sized businesses. Many dispensaries, farms, manufacturers, and ancillary companies are locally owned, creating opportunities for entrepreneurs and keeping profits within communities. These mom-and-pop operations contribute to neighborhood employment, commercial real estate occupancy, and local tax bases in ways large industrial projects often do not.
From a tax perspective, cannabis already delivers significant returns to state governments through excise taxes, sales taxes, and licensing fees, funding schools, infrastructure, and public health programs. Shipbuilding generates tax revenue primarily through payroll and corporate activity, but its overall footprint is smaller due to limited production volume.
Shipbuilding remains strategically important and worthy of investment, particularly for national security and industrial resilience. But economically, cannabis already touches more workers, more states, and more local economies, despite operating under federal restrictions. The comparison suggests while shipbuilding represents a long-term industrial project, cannabis is a functioning, revenue-generating sector whose economic contributions are already being felt across much of the country.
