Page 9 – The Fresh Toast

Minnesota And Cannabis

Anthony Washington

-

January 30, 2026

How Minnesota and cannabis evolved, from early decriminalization to legalization, with notable quirks and cautious next steps.

The whole country has been fixed on what is going on there, but what about Minnesota and cannabis? The state has always had a complicated relationship with substances which alter the mood. From beer halls built by German immigrants to the slow, careful legalization of cannabis, the state’s approach has tended to mix cultural enthusiasm with regulatory caution.

Cannabis in Minnesota has a longer history than many assume. Hemp was grown in the Upper Midwest as early as World War II, encouraged by the federal government for rope and fiber production. Recreational cannabis use followed national trends in the 1960s and 1970s, but enforcement remained strict for decades. In 1976, Minnesota became one of the first states to decriminalize possession of small amounts, replacing jail time with a fine—an early sign of the state’s pragmatic streak.

Medical cannabis arrived much later. Minnesota legalized medical marijuana in 2014, but with one of the most restrictive programs in the country. Smoking flower was prohibited, qualifying conditions were limited, and access was tightly controlled. That conservative framework shaped public expectations: cannabis was tolerated, but not embraced.

Everything shifted in 2023, when Minnesota legalized adult-use cannabis. The law emphasized public health, equity, and regulation over speed. Tribal nations moved first, opening legal dispensaries on sovereign land, while the state built a licensing system from scratch. The deliberate pace frustrated some consumers, but it also reflected Minnesota’s preference for methodical governance over fast commercialization.

Today, cannabis in Minnesota exists in a transitional phase. Medical programs are expanding, adult-use sales are rolling out gradually, and THC beverages—derived from hemp and legal earlier than marijuana flower—have become a uniquely Minnesotan phenomenon. It is not unusual to find cannabis-infused seltzers sold alongside craft beer in liquor stores, a quirk few states share.

Alcohol, of course, has long been woven into Minnesota’s identity. Waves of German and Scandinavian immigrants brought brewing traditions which still shape the state’s drinking culture. Beer became dominant, from legacy brands like Grain Belt to modern craft standouts such as Summit and Surly. For decades, Minnesota’s “3.2 beer” laws defined how and where alcohol could be sold, reinforcing the idea regulation mattered as much as consumption.

Minnesotans drink at rates roughly in line with the Upper Midwest, with binge drinking historically higher than the national average, particularly in rural areas. Beer remains the favorite, especially light lagers and locally brewed IPAs, though spirits and cocktails have gained popularity in the Twin Cities. Seasonal drinking traditions—from ice-fishing beers to summer lake weekends—remain deeply ingrained.

The contrast between alcohol and cannabis is striking. Alcohol was normalized early and regulated slowly. Cannabis is being legalized carefully, with rules in place before widespread retail access. The reversal reflects changing attitudes, especially among younger adults who increasingly view cannabis as an alternative rather than a supplement to drinking.

Looking ahead, Minnesota’s next steps include expanding retail cannabis access, approving social consumption spaces, and continuing automatic expungement for past cannabis offenses. Policymakers are also watching how cannabis affects alcohol sales, public health, and impaired driving.

In typical Minnesota fashion, the goal is balance. Not prohibition. Not a free-for-all. Just a steady, regulated approach to substances have always played a role in how Minnesotans relax, socialize, and unwind—whether at a lake cabin, a neighborhood bar, or somewhere new entirely.

The Rise of the “Sober-ish” Guy

Anthony Washington

-

January 28, 2026

0

The rise of the “Sober-ish” guy explains why men are drinking less, choosing balance, and redefining modern social life.

This isn’t Dry January. It isn’t a wellness cleanse, a moral reset, or a social media badge of honor. It’s quieter than that. Across bars, dates, living rooms, and stadium couches, more men are simply drinking less — without announcing it, apologizing for it, or calling it sobriety. We are in the era of the rise of the “Sober-ish” guy.

The “sober-ish” guy isn’t abstinent. He still goes out. He still watches the game. He still orders something interesting at the bar. He’s just done feeling like trash the next morning.

What’s changing isn’t masculinity or morality — it’s tolerance. Not physical tolerance, but lifestyle tolerance. Men in their 30s, 40s, and 50s are realizing alcohol’s upside no longer outweighs its downside. Poor sleep. Lingering anxiety. Weight gain. Foggy mornings. The cost is now obvious, and the payoff feels smaller.

Unlike past anti-drinking movements, this shift isn’t driven by doctors or public health campaigns. It’s driven by lived experience. Men don’t want to quit fun — they want to quit the hangover, the bloat, the irritability, and the creeping sense one night out derails three days of productivity.

This is where “sober-ish” culture finds its footing. Instead of quitting alcohol entirely, men are editing it out of certain moments. Weeknights. Work dinners. First dates. Long flights. Sunday afternoons. Alcohol becomes optional rather than automatic.

Cannabis, particularly low-dose and socially acceptable formats, is increasingly filling the gap. For some men, it functions as a cleaner social lubricant — something which takes the edge off without hijacking the next day. A drink used to be the default way to relax, bond, or celebrate. Now, a mild edible or vape can play a similar role without the physical tax.

This shift is already reshaping social spaces. Bars are adapting with better non-alcoholic cocktails, THC-friendly patios in legal states, and menus assuming not everyone wants a buzz ending in regret. On dates, ordering something other than alcohol is no longer a red flag — it’s often a quiet signal of self-awareness. Watching sports no longer requires a six-pack; it requires something keeping energy up rather than dragging it down.

Festivals, once defined by excess, are also adjusting. Hydration stations, cannabis lounges, and sober-curious programming acknowledge a crowd wanting stimulation without self-sabotage. The culture of endurance drinking — proving you can outlast everyone else — is losing relevance.

Importantly, this isn’t about virtue. Men aren’t trying to be better than anyone else. They’re trying to feel better. They still want connection, laughter, looseness, and shared rituals. They just want them without the aftermath.

The rise of the sober-ish guy reflects a broader cultural recalibration. Alcohol hasn’t disappeared, but its monopoly on male social life has cracked. In its place is something more flexible, more individualized, and more honest.

Men aren’t sober. They’re just done feeling like trash.

Can An Evening Marijuana Microdose Wash Your Cares Away

Amy Hansen

-

January 28, 2026

0

Can an evening marijuana microdose wash your cares away and help anxious minds unplug from work, news, and nightly stress?

At the end of the day, the modern mind rarely powers down on its own. News alerts buzz late into the evening, work stress lingers long after laptops close, and anxious thoughts often follow people into bed. But can an evening marijuana microdose wash your cares away? For a growing number of adults, a small microdose at the end of the work day is becoming a gentler way to wash their cares away and reclaim a sense of calm — without the drawbacks of alcohol.

Microdosing cannabis typically means consuming a very low amount of THC, often between 1 and 3 milligrams, sometimes balanced with CBD. The goal is not intoxication or escapism. Instead, it is subtle relaxation: easing tension, quieting racing thoughts, and helping the body transition from a state of alertness to rest. Users often describe it as taking the edge off rather than altering their reality.

RELATED: How To Microdose Marijuana

Anxiety is one of the most common reasons people turn to evening microdosing. After a day filled with deadlines, financial worries, and nonstop headlines, the nervous system can remain stuck in “on” mode. A small dose of cannabis can help reduce baseline anxiety by gently interacting with the body’s endocannabinoid system, which plays a role in mood regulation and stress response. Unlike stronger doses, microdosing minimizes the risk of paranoia or mental fog, allowing people to stay present and clear-headed.

Another appeal is the ability to unplug from the news cycle. Many people find themselves doom-scrolling late into the night, absorbing negative headlines which heighten stress and disrupt sleep. A light cannabis microdose can make it easier to step away, put the phone down, and redirect attention toward calmer activities like reading, listening to music, or simply sitting quietly. The mental distance it creates is often enough to break the habit loop without numbing awareness.

Sleep is where many users notice the biggest benefit. Evening microdosing does not act like a sedative, but it can help calm the mind so sleep comes more naturally. By reducing anxiety and physical tension, people often fall asleep faster and experience fewer middle-of-the-night awakenings. Importantly, microdosing tends to preserve sleep quality, unlike alcohol, which may induce drowsiness but disrupts REM sleep and leads to restless nights.

This is where the comparison to alcohol becomes especially relevant. For decades, a glass or two of wine has been the default way to unwind. Yet alcohol is a depressant linked to poor sleep, increased anxiety the following day, inflammation, and long-term health risks. Even moderate drinking can fragment sleep cycles and worsen mood over time. A low-dose cannabis alternative offers relaxation without dehydration, hangovers, or the emotional rebound many people experience after drinking.

As interest grows, experts emphasize moderation and intention. Microdosing works best when it is consistent, measured, and paired with healthy evening routines. It is not about escaping problems, but about creating a smoother landing at the end of the day.

In a world that rarely slows down, a small marijuana microdose may offer a quieter, kinder way to wash the day away — helping anxious minds unplug, rest, and wake up clearer than they would with a nightcap.

Is There Now a Crack in the Wall Between Cannabis Use and Gun Rights

Terry Hacienda

-

January 28, 2026

0

Is There Now a Crack in the Wall Between Cannabis Use and Gun Rights

Has Minneapolis upended politics and is there now a crack in the wall between cannabis sue and gun rights? There is pressure on the administration.

For decades, the relationship between cannabis use and gun ownership in the United States has been shaped by conflicting legal frameworks and cultural trends. Since the Gun Control Act of 1968, federal law has prohibited individuals who are “unlawful users” of controlled substances from possessing or purchasing firearms, a rule that historically included cannabis because it remained classified as a Schedule I drug. As more states have moved to legalize medical and recreational marijuana use, this federal prohibition has produced a legal disconnect: people who legally use cannabis under state law can be barred from firearm rights under federal law, while gun ownership, protected by the Second Amendment and upheld in key Supreme Court decisions like District of Columbia v. Heller, has remained a deeply entrenched individual right.

Recent events in Minnesota have intensified national conversations about gun use, public safety, and federal regulation. The fatal shooting of 37-year-old Renee Good in Minneapolis by a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent sparked widespread protest and media attention, thrusting discussions about when and how guns should be carried into the spotlight. The current administration’s response — including comments from national leaders suggesting that certain forms of gun carry at protests may be inappropriate — has prompted debate and scrutiny from both sides of the political aisle, especially in a state with permissive carry laws. The President’s remarks Good “should not have been carrying a gun,” despite Minnesota’s legal provisions for open and concealed carry, have underscored a broader willingness among federal officials to reconsider how guns are used in public spaces and under what circumstances.

Cannabis use and gun rights have intersected not just legally but culturally. While states such as Minnesota grapple with questions of public safety following high-profile shootings, federal courts are taking up cases that challenge the application of firearm prohibitions to marijuana users. Several appellate courts have ruled barring state-sanctioned cannabis consumers from owning guns could violate the Second Amendment, creating legal pressure that may culminate in a decisive Supreme Court ruling. Advocates argue these challenges underscore the outdated nature of federal cannabis policy in a nation where a majority of states have embraced some form of legalization.

That uncertainty has also been visible inside the administration itself. In recent press briefings, the White House press secretary struggled to clearly articulate a definitive position on gun control, particularly when pressed on how new restrictions might apply to lawful gun owners versus criminal misuse. Repeated attempts to clarify whether the administration favors broader limits on public carry, enforcement changes, or legislative reform yielded cautious, and at times contradictory, responses. The moment underscored the administration’s difficulty in balancing public safety concerns with constitutional protections, revealing a lack of consensus on how far any restructuring of gun policy should go.

Amid these legal and political tensions, leaders in the current administration have repeatedly appeared on national news outlets discussing the need to rethink how guns are carried and used by average citizens. Some administration figures have indicated that the nation should consider stricter guidelines for public gun carry, citing recent violence and demanding a reevaluation of existing policies. This shift has sparked sharp disagreements with traditional gun rights advocates.

The National Rifle Association, for example, publicly criticized comments from federal officials seemed to question the rights of lawful gun owners, calling such statements “dangerous and wrong” and stressing law-abiding citizens deserve their full Second Amendment protections.

At the same time, the broader national dialogue remains unsettled. With public opinion sharply divided, legal challenges pending in the courts, and political leaders offering competing visions for the future of gun policy, it is far from clear where the balance will ultimately fall. As lawmakers, judges, and citizens continue to hash out these issues, the evolving conversation about cannabis use, gun ownership, and public safety highlights lingering tensions in American law and society.

Is CBD Next On The Fed’s Hit List

Terry Hacienda

-

January 27, 2026

0

Is CBD next on the fed’s hit list amid slow cannabis reform, hemp restrictions, and rising regulatory pressure?

For more than a decade, cannabis policy in the United States has moved at a glacial pace. Despite widespread public support, state-level legalization, and the emergence of a multibillion-dollar industry, federal reform has remained slow, fragmented, and often contradictory. That pattern has now raised a new and uncomfortable question across the wellness, agriculture, and retail sectors: Is CBD next on the fed’s hit list?

RELATED: Cannabis Can Help PTSD

The story begins with cannabis itself. While a majority of states have legalized medical or adult-use marijuana, federal law continues to classify cannabis as a Schedule I substance. Efforts to reschedule or deschedule cannabis have been announced, delayed, studied, and revisited, creating regulatory uncertainty touching everything from banking and research to interstate commerce. This slow walking of cannabis reform from both the current and past president has rippled outward, ensnaring industries once thought to be safely separated from marijuana.

Hemp was supposed to be different. Federally legalized in the 2018 Farm Bill, hemp was championed as an agricultural and economic opportunity, particularly for struggling rural communities. No one played a more visible role in hemp’s return than Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who made the crop a centerpiece of his push to revive farm economies in deeply red regions of the state. For Kentucky farmers, hemp was not a culture-war issue but a pragmatic replacement for declining tobacco revenues and shrinking commodity margins.

Kentucky quickly became one of the nation’s leading hemp producers, investing in processing facilities, research partnerships, and pilot programs tied to CBD extraction. The political history makes the current regulatory climate especially fraught. As lawmakers debate tightening hemp definitions and closing cannabinoid “loopholes,” the consequences would land not just on coastal wellness brands, but on farmers in conservative states that were encouraged to plant hemp under federal guidance.

CBD now sits at the center of this tension. Initially promoted as a non-intoxicating compound with potential wellness applications, CBD products flooded the market in everything from oils and capsules to beverages and pet treats. Yet the Food and Drug Administration has repeatedly declined to recognize CBD as a lawful dietary supplement, while also failing to propose a clear alternative regulatory pathway. The result has been a gray market defined by warning letters, uneven enforcement, and growing risk for compliant businesses.

At the same time, proposed revisions to the Farm Bill have raised alarms across the hemp industry. Efforts to restrict intoxicating hemp-derived products may be politically popular, but critics warn that overly broad language could effectively ban or severely limit CBD itself. For farmers, processors, and retailers, this would represent a dramatic reversal of federal policy—one that undermines years of investment encouraged by Washington.

What makes this moment particularly striking is the broader landscape of U.S. health policy. Regulators increasingly emphasize harm reduction and data-driven decision-making. Cannabis is widely acknowledged to be less harmful than many legal substances, and CBD has been studied for potential therapeutic uses. Yet instead of clarity, the industry faces contraction and prohibition by attrition.

And throughout these shifts, one category remains largely untouched. Despite well-documented links between alcohol and chronic disease, addiction, and public safety risks, alcohol continues to enjoy stable federal treatment and powerful political insulation. While cannabis is slow-walked, hemp is narrowed, and CBD faces mounting pressure, alcohol remains fully normalized and aggressively marketed.

As federal health policies evolve and cannabis reform continues to stall, the question is no longer whether CBD will be regulated, but whether it will be regulated out of existence—leaving behind farmers, including those in Kentucky’s heartland, who answered the call to grow a crop Washington once promised was safe.

Snowstorms, Cannabis And Some Interesting Tidbits

Sarah Johns

-

January 23, 2026

0

Snowstorms, cannabis and some interesting tidbits examining cold weather, cannabis versus alcohol, and unexpected winter facts.

Much of the country is in the grip of a serious cold weather storm, the kind rattling windows, shutting down highways, and sending people searching for extra blankets and something warm to take the edge off. When temperatures plunge well below normal, daily routines change quickly. People stay indoors, move less, eat differently, and often rethink what they drink or consume to get through the freeze. Their is renewed curiosity around marijuana in cold weather, especially how it compares to alcohol and whether it can actually help you feel warmer. Read on for snowstorms, cannabis and some interesting tidbits.

One of the biggest myths of winter is alcohol keeps you warm. While a stiff drink can create a temporary sensation of heat, it actually causes blood vessels near the skin to dilate. That pulls warmth away from your core and increases heat loss, which can be dangerous in extreme cold. Cannabis works differently. THC does not raise body temperature, but it can change how the body perceives cold by altering sensory signals and relaxing muscles to keep them from tensing up in low temperatures. Many people report feeling more comfortable, calmer, and less aware of the chill after using cannabis, without the same physiological risks associated with alcohol in freezing conditions.

Certain forms of cannabis may be better suited for winter storms than others. Edibles and tinctures provide longer-lasting effects, which can be appealing during long nights indoors. Flower and vape products act faster, which some people prefer when coming in from the cold. Strains promoting body relaxation and mild euphoria are often favored during cold snaps, while overly stimulating varieties may feel less cozy when you are trying to stay warm and settled.

Cold weather itself brings some interesting and well-documented side effects. For one, the body tends to burn more calories when temperatures drop. Staying warm requires energy, and mild cold exposure can slightly increase calorie expenditure as the body works to maintain its core temperature. That does not mean winter weather is a weight loss plan, but it does explain why people often feel hungrier during cold spells.

There is also a long-standing statistical trend showing more babies are born about nine months after major winter storms and prolonged cold periods. When people are snowed in, travel is limited, and social calendars clear, time spent at home increases. Historically, this has translated into noticeable baby booms following harsh winters.

Another cold weather tidbit is how it affects sleep and mood. Shorter days and less sunlight can disrupt circadian rhythms, contributing to winter blues. Cannabis, particularly products supporting relaxation and sleep, is sometimes used by adults to help unwind during long, dark evenings. Again, moderation matters, especially when cold weather already encourages inactivity.

As the country rides out this intense cold weather storm, it is clear winter changes more than just the thermostat. It influences what people consume, how they cope, and even what shows up in the data months later. Cannabis is increasingly part of the seasonal conversation, offering a different option than alcohol for those looking to feel a little more comfortable while waiting for warmer days to return.

Will The Administration Unleash An Economic Upswing With Cannabis

Terry Hacienda

-

January 21, 2026

0

Will the administration unleash an economic upswing With cannabis and unlock jobs, investment, tax revenue nationwide?

Rescheduling cannabis under federal law would mark one of the most consequential economic policy shifts in decades, unlocking growth across industries while reshaping how the United States approaches regulation, investment, and small business development. By moving cannabis out of Schedule I, the federal government would remove long-standing barriers constraining legitimate commerce, innovation, and job creation, allowing a multibillion-dollar industry to more fully integrate into the US economy.

One of the most immediate economic impacts of rescheduling would be access to traditional financial systems. Cannabis businesses have long operated in a cash-heavy environment due to banking restrictions, increasing costs and security risks. Rescheduling would encourage broader participation from banks, credit unions, insurers, and payment processors, lowering operational friction and improving transparency. This shift alone would reduce compliance costs and allow capital to flow more efficiently into expansion, infrastructure, and workforce development.

Tax policy would also change dramatically. Currently, cannabis operators are subject to punitive federal tax treatment under IRS Section 280E, which disallows standard business deductions. Rescheduling would eliminate this burden, freeing up capital for reinvestment. Those savings would ripple outward, supporting higher wages, more hiring, improved benefits, and greater purchasing from local suppliers. State and local governments would also benefit from stronger, more stable tax revenues tied to compliant and profitable operators.

The labor impact would be substantial. The legal cannabis industry already supports hundreds of thousands of jobs, from cultivation and manufacturing to retail, logistics, marketing, and compliance. Rescheduling would accelerate job creation, particularly in states who have been cautious due to federal uncertainty. Ancillary industries such as construction, real estate, software, security, legal services, and advertising would see increased demand, further amplifying employment gains.

Notably, rescheduling would also buoy the alcohol industry, which has made significant early investments in cannabis. Major beer, wine, and spirits companies have quietly positioned themselves through minority stakes, research partnerships, and beverage-focused cannabis products. As regulatory clarity improves, these investments stand to gain value. Alcohol companies bring decades of experience in branding, distribution, compliance, and consumer marketing, skills translating effectively to cannabis. Rather than cannibalizing alcohol entirely, rescheduling may encourage hybrid portfolios and cross-category innovation, helping alcohol producers adapt to shifting consumer preferences while maintaining relevance and growth.

Perhaps the most meaningful impact, however, would be felt at the community level through the expansion of thousands of mom-and-pop cannabis businesses. Small, locally owned dispensaries, cultivators, manufacturers, and service providers anchor economic activity in neighborhoods often overlooked by traditional investment. These businesses create local jobs, lease storefronts, purchase from nearby vendors, and contribute to municipal tax bases. In rural areas, cannabis cultivation has already revitalized farmland and provided new income streams for family-owned operations. Rescheduling would give these businesses greater stability, access to credit, and a clearer path to long-term sustainability.

In economic terms, rescheduling cannabis is not merely a regulatory adjustment; it is a normalization of an industry already exists at scale. By aligning federal policy with economic reality, the US stands to unlock growth, modernize regulation, strengthen local communities, and reinforce American leadership in a global market that continues to expand.

Davos’ Evolving Take On Cannabis

Anthony Washington

-

January 21, 2026

0

Davos’ Evolving Take On Cannabis reveals how global leaders now view regulation, investment, and public health.

For decades, the annual gathering in Davos, Switzerland has been shorthand for elite consensus building — a place where global leaders discuss finance, geopolitics, climate change, and the future of work. This year has been one of the most interesting and volatile conference, but what has been Davos’ evolving take on cannabis? The green plant was not always welcome in the conversation. In fact, its early mentions at Davos landed with a bang, provoking raised eyebrows and quiet skepticism among policymakers and corporate executives. Today, the tone has evolved significantly, reflecting how cannabis has moved from taboo to a legitimate economic, public health, and regulatory topic on the world stage.

When cannabis first entered the Davos conversation in the mid-to-late 2010s, it did so largely as a disruptive novelty. Panels and side events framed it as an emerging social experiment driven by legalization in Canada and a growing number of U.S. states. Early discussions focused on risk: youth access, impaired driving, and the fear legalization could undermine public health. At the time, cannabis was often grouped with broader debates on addiction, illicit trade, and law enforcement rather than innovation or wellness.

The initial shock value, however, opened the door to deeper analysis. As legalization expanded and early data emerged, Davos began to treat cannabis less as a moral issue and more as a policy and economic case study. By the early 2020s, cannabis had become a recurring topic in off-agenda sessions and reports connected to the World Economic Forum. The framing shifted toward regulation, harm reduction, and market design — familiar territory for an audience accustomed to managing complex global systems.

One of the most notable evolutions in Davos’s stance has been the normalization of cannabis as an investable sector. Executives and investors now discuss cannabis alongside biotech, wellness, and consumer packaged goods. Conversations increasingly focus on supply chains, cross-border trade barriers, taxation, and the challenges of banking access. Rather than asking whether cannabis should exist, Davos discussions now center on how to regulate it effectively and equitably.

Public health has also taken on a more nuanced role. Instead of blanket opposition, panels examine comparative risk — weighing cannabis against alcohol, opioids, and pharmaceuticals. This has led to more pragmatic discussions around medical cannabis access, pain management, mental health, and aging populations. The emphasis is not on promotion, but on evidence-based policy reducing harm while acknowledging consumer behavior.

Social equity has become another key pillar of the Davos cannabis conversation. As global leaders confront inequality and inclusion, cannabis legalization is increasingly discussed in the context of criminal justice reform, economic opportunity, and repairing harms from decades of prohibition. This aligns with Davos’s broader focus on stakeholder capitalism and inclusive growth.

Today, cannabis at Davos is no longer a headline-grabbing novelty. It is a mature, if still evolving, topic woven into conversations about global markets, health systems, and governance. What started with a bang has settled into something far more consequential: a recognition cannabis policy is not a fringe issue, but a real-world test of how societies manage change, balance risk, and adapt to shifting cultural norms.

Is Cannabis Putting A Cork In Wine

Amy Hansen

-

January 20, 2026

0

Is cannabis putting a cork in wine explores crashing wine sales and cannabis replacing drinking occasions.

In recent years, data from industry surveys and academic research have sparked a compelling debate: Is cannabis putting a cork in wine? Across markets in North America and beyond, wine sales have softened, while cannabis consumption—particularly in legalized regions—has surged. The overlap between these trends points to shifting consumer preferences and a possible substitution effect is rippling across hospitality, retail and cultural events.

Wine, long a staple of American social life and a cornerstone of the global beverage industry, is experiencing headwinds. Wine volumes have plateaued or declined in many mature markets as drinkers moderate their alcohol intake and younger generations skip traditional drinking occasions. According to market research, global wine demand hit its lowest levels in decades in 2024.

U.S. survey data found a notable portion of regular wine consumers report drinking less wine, with some reducing consumption in favor of alternatives including cannabis products. Younger adults aged 21–34, in particular, are more likely to consider cannabis as a reasonable alternative to wine for social and relaxation occasions.

Cannabis consumption has escalated rapidly since legalization in many states. For the first time, daily or near-daily marijuana use in the U.S. has surpassed similar levels of alcohol consumption, signaling a shift in recreational habits. Surveys indicate more than half of cannabis consumers report drinking less alcohol—or none at all—after incorporating cannabis into their routines, suggesting cannabis is substituting for alcoholic beverages in many social contexts.

Industry analysts have documented a substitution effect, where greater access to cannabis and cannabis-infused beverages correlates with declines in wine and beer sales in certain local markets. One report noted in regions with cannabis products readily available, more consumers are choosing cannabis over alcohol in casual settings.

Academic research supports this trend, showing a negative association between wine consumption and cannabis use, particularly for social drinking occasions. This substitution seems strongest for lighter wines like rosé and sparkling varieties, which historically have been popular with younger drinkers.

The potential shift from wine to cannabis has implications beyond producers’ sales reports. Restaurants, wine bars and tasting rooms are adjusting to changing customer behavior, with some offering cannabis-infused drinks alongside or in place of traditional wine lists where local laws permit. Retailers once relied on wine sales for a significant portion of revenue are exploring cannabis accessories and complementary products to capture consumer interest.

Wine festivals and tastings—long a draw for tourism and local economies—are confronting attendance shifts as some participants opt for cannabis-centric events instead. Even promotional calendars are evolving to include “weed and food pairings” and other hybrid experiences reflect broader lifestyle trends.

As both industries adapt, the interplay between wine and cannabis continues to unfold, with consumer habits driving change at every level of the food and beverage ecosystem.

Is the Icky Sticky the Chef’s Kiss

Anthony Washington

-

January 20, 2026

0

Is icky-sticky marijuana really the Chef’s kiss? Discover how Gen Z is redefining cannabis.

Once upon a time, cannabis had a very limited vocabulary. It was either “reefer,” “dope,” or the ever-suspicious “marijuana,” pronounced with a pause that suggested imminent moral collapse. Today, cannabis language has evolved faster than federal policy memos can be printed, and Gen Z and younger millennials are leading the glow-up.

Enter phrases like icky sticky, chef’s kiss, gas, loud, za, and no notes. These aren’t just slang for slang’s sake. They’re cultural shorthand, expressing quality, vibe, and intention in ways that older terminology never could. Saying a strain is “icky sticky” isn’t about stickiness alone. It’s a multisensory review. It implies potency, care in cultivation, and an experience worth savoring. Add a chef’s kiss, and suddenly cannabis is no longer contraband. It’s craft.

This shift mirrors how younger generations talk about almost everything. Food isn’t just good; it’s bussin. Outfits don’t look nice; they eat. Cannabis has followed the same path, moving from secrecy to aesthetic, from shame to shared language. Dispensaries now sound less like pharmacies and more like playlists curated by someone with excellent taste and strong opinions.

Meanwhile, somewhere deep inside a government building with carpet from 1987, an older federal official is still warning about “high-potency marijuana” as if THC just appeared last Tuesday. These are the same voices clinging to terms like “drug abuse” while ignoring that consumers are discussing terpene profiles with the same seriousness once reserved for wine. The disconnect is almost impressive.

Language matters because it reveals mindset. When cannabis is framed with playful, expressive language, it signals normalization. It’s no longer something whispered about in parking lots. It’s something reviewed, ranked, memed, and shared. Gen Z didn’t invent cannabis culture, but they did remix it, adding humor, irony, and an insistence that enjoyment and responsibility can coexist.

Younger millennials bridge the gap, fluent in both worlds. They remember the anxiety of bad weed and worse legal consequences, but they also embrace today’s vocabulary because it reflects reality. Cannabis is part of wellness routines, creative processes, and social rituals. It deserves language that feels alive, not stuck in a cautionary pamphlet.

So yes, the icky sticky can absolutely be the chef’s kiss. Not because it’s funny, though it is, but because it represents a generational shift. Cannabis is no longer defined by fear-based terminology or outdated thinking. It’s defined by experience, expression, and culture.

And if that makes some older policymakers uncomfortable, well… no notes.

The Fresh ToastThe most trusted name in cannabis

Minnesota And Cannabis

How Minnesota and cannabis evolved, from early decriminalization to legalization, with notable quirks and cautious next steps.

The Rise of the “Sober-ish” Guy

The rise of the “Sober-ish” guy explains why men are drinking less, choosing balance, and redefining modern social life.

Can An Evening Marijuana Microdose Wash Your Cares Away

Can an evening marijuana microdose wash your cares away and help anxious minds unplug from work, news, and nightly stress?

Is There Now a Crack in the Wall Between Cannabis Use and Gun Rights

Has Minneapolis upended politics and is there now a crack in the wall between cannabis sue and gun rights? There is pressure on the administration.

Is CBD Next On The Fed’s Hit List

Is CBD next on the fed’s hit list amid slow cannabis reform, hemp restrictions, and rising regulatory pressure?

Snowstorms, Cannabis And Some Interesting Tidbits

Snowstorms, cannabis and some interesting tidbits examining cold weather, cannabis versus alcohol, and unexpected winter facts.

Will The Administration Unleash An Economic Upswing With Cannabis

Will the administration unleash an economic upswing With cannabis and unlock jobs, investment, tax revenue nationwide?

Davos’ Evolving Take On Cannabis

Davos’ Evolving Take On Cannabis reveals how global leaders now view regulation, investment, and public health.

Is Cannabis Putting A Cork In Wine

Is cannabis putting a cork in wine explores crashing wine sales and cannabis replacing drinking occasions.

Is the Icky Sticky the Chef’s Kiss

Is icky-sticky marijuana really the Chef’s kiss? Discover how Gen Z is redefining cannabis.

Don't Miss Your Weekly Dose of The Fresh Toast.