Sunday, July 5, 2026
Home Blog Page 858

Serena Williams’ Catsuit Controversy Evokes Battle Over Women Wearing Shorts

0

At the French Open, Serena Williams wore a custom-made black catsuit. On August 24, the president of the French Tennis Federation said the outfit “wouldn’t be back.” It “went too far,” he continued. It didn’t “respect the game and the place.”

Among Williams’ defenders, the pushback was swift – the decision indicative of how female athletes face more scrutiny and are held to outdated dress standards.

As a historian of the American fashion industry, I’m not surprised when an outfit worn by a female athlete generates outrage. I thought of Suzanne Lenglen, the French tennis star of the late 1910s who shocked onlookers with her knee-length tennis dress. Coincidentally, Stade Roland Garros, the stadium where Serena wore her suit during the French Open, has a court named after Lenglen.

In a 1926 photo, French tennis player Suzanne Lenglen wears a knee-high skirt. AP Photo

This is simply the most recent chapter of a centurylong debate over the place of informality and immodesty in our dress: how short can that skirt be? Should the first lady be able to don a tank top? What about wearing sneakers to prom?

Sportswear, which can be both informal and immodest, has served as a flashpoint in these debates – particularly for women.

In 1936, a sportswriter named Paul Gallico argued that female athletes and their clothing were offensive.

Women who play sports, he wrote, “stick out places when they play, wear funny clothes, get out of breath or perspire.” He didn’t like that because “it’s a lady’s business to look beautiful, and there are hardly any sports in which she seems able to do it.”

Nothing, it seemed, pissed people off more than women in shorts. Starting in the late 1920s, shorts became the much-contested replacement for bloomers, the puffy-legged, bifurcated garment worn under long skirts. Women who did wear athletic garb were supposed to keep out of the public eye because it was deemed unfeminine and, yes, immodest.

Female tennis players were on the frontlines of the battle for public acceptance of shorts. Even though tennis industry officials and country club muckety mucks wrote dress codes that outlawed shorts, many women refused to adhere to the rules and continued showing up to play wearing them.

Some were thrown off the courts. But it’s hard to enforce dress codes when everybody’s doing it.

Not surprisingly, this really rankled the old guard.

“If you gals really knew how cute you look in a well-cut dress, you wouldn’t hanker to wear shorts,” one etiquette writer grumbled in the 1936 book, “Co-Ediquette: Poise and Popularity for Every Girl.” “Of course, you’ve got to be comfortable, ah, me! Even if you have to insult the aesthetic sense of men to do it?”

Most women shrugged – and kept on wearing shorts, on and off the court.

In time, shorts as hiking wear, shorts as gardening garb and shorts as loungewear became increasingly common. It seems the old guard had been worn down – or simply died off.

By the end of the 1930s, younger women were acknowledging a shift in attitudes. “American women live 24 hours a day in sports clothes,” one college student told the Boston Post. “Husband no longer come home and deliver stern lectures upon finding their wives cooking supper in shorts. It’s just taken for granted.”

While some husbands may have skipped the stern lectures, it took three more decades for shorts to fully reach widespread acceptance.

But in tennis, notions of immodesty and informality die hard. When female tennis players such as Billie Jean King wore very short, gored skirts and sleeveless polo shirts in the 1970s, they were criticized for their “radical” outfits. Time and again, the powers-that-be in tennis push back on immodesty, and the players push forward towards personal choice and – dare we say – personal style.

Wearing a sleeveless top, Billie Jean King competes during the finals match for the women’s singles title at Wimbledon in July 1973. AP Photo

So, we’ve seen this all before. New stuff – never-seen-before stuff – has long spelled trouble for female athletes and sparked public outcry.

Today, the sartorial standards of what you can and can’t wear in certain settings have changed so radically that institutions can’t keep up. You almost feel sorry for the French official who announced the ban on the catsuit. In the big picture, he won’t do anything to stop the crawl of social change.

And how did Serena Williams respond to being chastised for wearing her black catsuit?

She simply showed up a few days later to win U.S. Open matches wearing a tulle tutu.The Conversation

Serena Williams serves during the fourth round of the U.S. Open on Sept. 2. AP Photo/Andres Kudacki

Deirdre Clemente, Associate Professor of History, University of Nevada, Las Vegas

This article was originally published on The Conversation.

This ‘Game of Thrones’ Star Could Lose $2 Million Over Contract Dispute

0

While much of the surprising twists of this much-hyped “Game of Thrones” off-season have focused on where the characters’ storylines will go next season, the newest development involves one actor’s real-life drama. Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, who plays the moody Jaime Lannister on the show, is being sued by his former manager Jill Littman for $2 million in backpay plus interest. In addition, the actor is facing immigration fraud accusations, according to The Hollywood Reporter.

The dispute revolves around a decade-long contract between Littman’s agency, Impression Entertainment, and Coster-Waldau. Coster-Waldau terminated their business relationship in 2015 for reasons he claimed were personal, not financial.

“I am nothing but grateful for our many years working together and the success we shared,” the actor’s e-mail to Littman read. “And the reason I have decided to leave Impression is not to go somewhere else but to basically take control myself. ‘Game of Thrones’ is coming to an end now.”

Throughout their agreement, Littman earned 10 percent of whatever income Coster-Waldau was paid. Coster-Waldau insisted that their partnership was strictly an oral agreement, which did not include compensation for his manager following the termination, However, according to Littman, the unusual arrangement of their deal included her receiving compensation post-termination.

How was their deal unusual? In April, Littman came forward with a written contract that refutes Coster-Waldau’s claims. “This agreement dated from the time that her agency sponsored Coster-Waldau for a 0-1 visa. As part of what needed to be given to U.S. immigration authorities, she delivered to the government a signed agreement between Impression and Coster-Waldau,” wrote THR.

Through his agent at William Morris Endeavor, Coster-Waldau insisted the agreement was a “sham.” The comment has cast the spotlight on possible immigration fraud operating in Hollywood. A Los Angeles Court determined this week the written agreement was real and ordered Coster-Waldau to pay up. But the actor refuses to comment on the trial and his lawyer appealed the verdict, requesting a retrial.

“Although a Lannister always pays his debts, NCW has declined to honor the final ruling of the arbitrator and pay the compensation found to be due his former manager for all the successes she contributed to during her eight-year reign,” said Howard King, an attorney representing Littman.

Through the trial, Coster-Waldau’s payments per episode on the HBO show were made public. He was reportedly paid $942,857 for each “Game of Thrones” episode, which was then raised to $1,066,667 for the upcoming season. He also received loads of assorted bonuses for his role, including a $50K bump for a SAG nomination and $10K for allowing his likeness to be used for “Game of Thrones” trading cards.

There’s Already A Surprising Number Of Ganjapreneurs In Oklahoma

The passage of a liberal medical marijuana law in Oklahoma was a surprise to many across the nation, whether involved in the cannabis industry or not. It turns out, when it comes to pot, Oklahomans are full of surprises, most of which revolve around wanting to get into the cannabis industry at the ground level.

State Question 788 passed during the primaries, thus legalizing medical marijuana on June 26, 2018. The following day, the first medical marijuana dispensary opened, waiting for regulations to hit so they could begin business in their Tulsa location. Since then, it’s been a landslide of applications to grow, manufacture and sell medical marijuana.

So far 1,100 commercial applications have been received by the State Department of Health. Compared to the 2,200 patients and caregivers who have thus far signed up for medical cannabis, a glut is on the horizon.

There were not many emergency rules written into the law in order to regulate businesses, creating a free marketplace, but also creating somewhat of a jumble. “We’re on pace right now to out-license Colorado [commercially],” stated Bud Scott, executive director of the medical cannabis trade group, New Health Solutions Oklahoma.

At the pace that Oklahomans are joining the commercial side of the marijuana movement, it seems like legalization could either be on the horizon or is even being teased at right now. “It’s a really interesting scenario that we’re opening up like a recreational market,” added Scott.

Interesting is definitely the word for what’s unfolding in this corner of the Bible Belt. Oklahoma has been a red state, with a majority of its residents voting for Republican presidential candidates, since 1968. It goes to show that cannabis is truly a non-partisan issue and that conservatives feel the need for weed as strongly as those on the left.

With the sheer number of ganjapreneurs already applying to open up shop in the cannabis field, the impending overgrowth it could create would likely drive prices of medical cannabis down heftily. One prediction put future wholesale marijuana at $800 per pound. Which is great for patients, especially low income adults, seniors and veterans, but perhaps not so hot for those who were looking to cash in on the green rush.

It’s still nothing to complain about as of yet. Sarah Lee Gossett Parrish, an Oklahoma City attorney and Oklahoma Cannabis Trade Association member, optimistically chimed in to Muskogee Phoenix, “I think it will all shake out. Right now, I think it’s an unknown adventure.”

Apple Scraps Fingerprint ID On Upcoming iPhones

0

Recent reports from Mac analysts suggest that Apple may get rid of the Touch ID feature in their new batch of phones, choosing to stick with Face ID since that’s the security measure that most users are excited about.

On September 12, Apple will finally unveil their upcoming iPhones. The three predicted smartphones are rumored to be iterations of the iPhone X, all with different capabilities and prices, running on Apple’s latest software and featuring apps that were previously exclusive to the company’s most expensive phone. 9to5Mac reports that Apple has decided to scrap Touch ID and that all of their devices will rely 0n Facial ID as their main security measure. So if you’re paranoid and believe that the NSA is spying on you through your camera, you’re screwed.

While no one knows the reasoning behind this decision, Mac analysts claim OLED screens (the ones used on the iPhone X) have sensors that are very limited and that would only enable Touch ID on specific areas of the screen. Having Touch ID and Face ID could also seem redundant for Apple, since users will choose one security measure over the other, and everything suggests that people will be interested in the latest technology that’s mostly proven to be very safe and reliable.

This removal of fingerprint ID may seem like something small, but it could become another major difference between iPhone and Android devices. While Samsung is working on improving their version of Facial ID, no one has mastered the technology as much as Apple has, incorporating it into Memojis and other features that run exclusively on the iPhone.

Android has other security features like Android pattern that are very famous among users, but Face ID is still the most discussed security measure out of all smartphones. We’d be surprised if that were to change anytime soon.

Young Thug Facing Felony Marijuana And Drug Charges

Rapper Young Thug is facing eight counts of drug and gun felony charges stemming from a September 2017 arrest in Atlanta, Georgia. According to TMZ, the rapper (whose real name is Jeffrey Lamar Williams) is being charged with possession of hydrocodone, methamphetamine, and marijuana with intent to distribute. In addition, he faces two counts of codeine possession, possession of amphetamine, and alprazolam, plus a firearm possession charge.

The eight felony charges is fallout from last year, when Young Thug was pulled over by cops for tinted windows and found in possession of 2.5 oz. of marijuana. These charges are reportedly unrelated to the gun felony charge the rapper was hit with last month in Los Angeles, following a release party for his Slime Language album at Dave & Busters.

Atlanta doesn’t seem to be a good place for rappers and cannabis, as Ty Dolla $ign was arrested in the city Wednesday after a vehicle search found marijuana and cocaine in the limousine van he was in. The crooner was in Atlanta to perform alongside G-Eazy, Lil Uzi Vert, and YBN Nahmir on the Endless Summer Tour.

He was released on a $6,000 bond, though his lawyer, Drew Findling, contests the charges.

“He had no drugs on his person at all,” Findling told Channel 2 Action News. He said there were five others in the car, not six as police initially reported. “Apparently there was a small amount of some drug found in the car, and they let five people walk away. And they let the international superstar go into custody.”

Back in 2015, Rick Ross was also arrested on misdemeanor marijuana charges outside Atlanta in Fayette County. Cops reportedly smelled marijuana emanating from the car and found five joints, leading to the charges.

Oldest Living Spouses Share Secret To 80-Year Marriage

Nobody really seems to know the secret behind a successful relationship, but a couple in Japan knows what works for them. And they might be worth listening to, because they’ve been married for 80 years.

Masao Matsumoto, 108, and his 100-year-old wife, Miyako, have been declared by Guinness World Records to be the oldest living spouses. They got married in October 1937. They will celebrate 81 years of marriage next month.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BmOZltIndWz

“I am so grateful that it brings me tears,” Miyako told Reuters.

“It’s thanks to my patience, really,” she added, as she posed with Masao in front of a framed Guinness certificate at the nursing home where they live.

According to Reuters, the couple never actually had a wedding, with Japan heading into war and Masao being sent overseas to help fight. But the two do have a large family, including 25 great grandkids.

“They’ve entered the last chapter of their life. It was a honor (for them) to receive this award. I would love them to continue living a peaceful life,” said the couple’s daughter Hiromi.

Says Guinness:

Miyako was still preparing family meals at the age of 98 while her husband continued to watch sport until earlier this year when his eyesight reached a point which meant he was no longer able to watch his favourite games on TV. Nevertheless, their love for each other has seen them enter the record books.

Japanese rank second in the world (just barely behind Hong Kong) for longevity with an average age of 84.

The record for oldest married couple ever by aggregate age, according to Guinness, continues to be held by Karl and Gurdren Dolven of Norway, who had a combined age of 210 years, 1 month and 34 days before Gurdrun died in 2004.

Non-Cannabis Based Business Owners Are Flourishing In Weed

People’s passions are as varied as the wildflowers that coat a fragrant hillside. They’re vibrant, they’re colorful and ofttimes more than one passion is plucked for life’s journey. People who are passionate about pot are passionate for a number of reasons, ranging from it feels good to its healing properties and social impact.

Activists and advocates who love weed from seed to consumption can rattle off state laws, pontificate on the many wonders of the plant, give lectures on the virtues of hemp and likely smoke one under the table, but that passion, that love, doesn’t always equate to business acumen in the cannabis arena.

There’s no question that cannabis has become big business, and though its roots are grounded in compassion and societal wellbeing, the fresh leaves that are getting the most monetary sunshine aren’t necessarily native to the plant; people have literally spliced themselves onto the marketplace because of rapid growth and high yields.

Not to say that newcomers aren’t joining for the right reasons. There are plenty of venture capitalists, investors and CEOs who have seen the proverbial light and recognize that they have an opportunity to not only make beaucoup bucks, but to help people in need. Philanthropy is practically built in when it comes to the business of cannabis.

What having this new wave of ganjapreneurs will ultimately mean for the marijuana movement isn’t clear quite yet, but a few things are for certain. Being able to smell test Maui Wowie versus Lemon Haze no longer a resume makes in this burgeoning industry and the business of cannabis has gotten a lot more serious.

While it’s an uncomfortable shift for many who never felt it right to monetize on a plant or especially on the very ill, with bigger businesses comes more regulation, and that can be a good thing, depending on the intentions of the people doing the regulating. Tracking weed from seed form to its final sale and testing pot for mold or pesticides are well intended, patient friendly practices. In another way, the taxes that come with to pay for it all are a hardship for many who need marijuana’s relief the most, such as seniors and veterans.

Striking a balance will take the efforts of those whose true love is making numbers crunch, those whose love to make businesses grow, grow, grow, and, importantly, those who love cannabis through and through. We can all learn from each other to create a non-exclusionary market if we can accept each other as the uniquely passionate beings that we are.

Missouri Will Vote On 3 Medical Marijuana Measures This November

Whereas in 2016, when Missouri pot activists were not able to collect enough signatures to get on the ballot, this year, three separate measures made the cut with John Hancocks to spare. Two are constitutional amendments, and one is a change to state law. Here’s how the three break down, what happens if two or even all three pass, and what Missouri law enforcement thinks of potential medical marijuana legalization.

All three measures will allow for growing at a wholesale level (only one measure allows for home grows), manufacturing, sales and consumption. The ailments covered are also similar in scope, including chronic conditions such as PTSD, pain, muscle spasticity and other ailments commonly found under the cannabis treatment umbrella.

Missourians for Patient Care is the measure aiming to change state law. It clocks in with the lowest tax, 2 percent, yet aims to spread the revenue across more causes than the other two. Taxes would go to veteran services, addiction treatment, public safety and early education for children living in the vicinity of medical marijuana facilities.

Funded in part by a non-profit that goes by the same name, Missourians for Patient Care are not required to report on other involved donors, though it shares an address with a media company run by the “Index-fund pioneer” himself, Rex Sinquefield, also known as a “mega donor.”

New Approach Missouri is one of the two constitutional amendments and it proposes a tax of 4 percent which would go specifically to veterans programs. New Approach Missouri’s proposed measure would give the Department of Health and Senior Services the authority to regulate licensing, cultivation, testing and the sales of marijuana. Missouri would also then be in the right place to start a seed to sale system that ensures cannabis goes to the patients for which it is intended.

Unlike the other two ballot measures, New Approach Missouri has hundreds of donors at different levels and they gathered the most signatures, including over 33,000 in the 7th Congressional District. Also unlike the others, New Approach allows for at home cultivation.

The Bradshaw Amendment would tax cannabis at 15 percent, but that money would be going toward establishing an institute of the state in order to research cures for incurable diseases. The amendment was concocted by a board of 9 and said board would handle the decisions as to licensing fees and exactly how much cannabis could be bought or sold at a time; they’d determine how many grow ops could operate and they’d identify and decide which diseases should be covered under the potential law.

The Springfield News-Leader reached out to all bodies of law enforcement they seemingly could, and though most of the answers came back with some form of “we are confined by state law, so however state law goes, we go,” others were clearly upset by the idea of medical marijuana and the potential next step of adult use cannabis.

Springfield Police Chief Paul Williams said, “The Missouri Police Chiefs Association has consistently opposed the legalization of marijuana, and that position, which I as a member and past president support, has not changed.”

It’s possible that once a law is enacted, should it be voted in, law enforcement officials such as Chief Williams will see that there there will not likely be a spike in crime and that arrest rates will actually go down, as patients will finally be able to obtain legal cannabis and show proof that what they’re carrying is legal. These should be positive signs along with the other many benefits of legalizing medical marijuana, such as a drop in opiate overdoses and not to mention the tax revenue it brings in.

All three potential medical marijuana enactments would clearly mean a positive step forward for Missouri and its residents, especially the very ill who need their medicine, but all three can’t be enacted. If there’s any kind of tie, the winner will be the one with “the largest affirmative vote…even if that (measure) did not receive the greatest majority of affirmative votes.” It really boils down to if Missourians want to grow their own weed, where they want their tax dollars to go and whom they want at the helm of this potential new medical marijuana marketplace.

You Can Adopt Dogs Too Nice For Government Training

0

All dogs have unique personalities and some of them are too nice and/or lazy to graduate from service training. These are obviously the best pets to keep around and now you can adopt one of your very own.

These puppies are available for adoption at TSA headquarters in Texas. For different reasons, be that because of their nervousness, lack of drive or simply being too friendly, these dogs didn’t complete the necessary training to be government qualified and are now up for adoption.

https://www.instagram.com/p/BnKCP5GHNi2

These dogs are all large breeds: German Shorthaired Pointers, Labrador retrievers, German shepherds, and Belgian Malinois. They’re all big animals suitable for sniffing out drugs, contraband, and intimidating people, which makes them even cuter.

There are several organizations that make sure to give “career dogs” a home. Some of these include Mission K9, which connects families to older and retired dogs, and Freedom Service Dogs of America, which trains shelter dogs to become service dogs and puts the pups who don’t make the cut  up for adoption.

While it’s a little sad to see a dog fail, especially after trying so hard, it’s very adorable and reassuring that programs like these exist, giving the puppies a second chance to do something else with their lives. Some would say these dogs got the better end of the stick; sleeping and cuddling sounds like a much better option than being a career dog anyway.

GOSSIP: MTV Blames J-LO For Disaster Ratings; Meghan And Harry Ask George and Amal Clooney To Be Royal Godparents

0

MTV BLAMES JLO FOR DISASTER RATINGS – EXCLUSIVE

MTV Video Music Awards ratings hit an all-time low this year and now producers are blaming Jennifer Lopez and even talking about scrapping the entire show all-together!

“You cannot forget the TV is a business and live award shows are expensive. With the ratings hitting an all-time low for the VMA’s there is no way the company can justify continuing with the award show. Shows must get viewers to get advertisers or else they will get cancelled. At this point MTV has little other choice but to finally cancel the show,” sources tell STRAIGHT SHUTER.

“Whenever there is a ratings disasters fingers are pointed. At the moment, most fingers are aiming at Jennifer Lopez. She got the big award and put on the big performance and she couldn’t attract the viewers. It is going to be a long time before anymore builds a live TV show around her again.”

MEGHAN AND HARRY ASK GEORGE AND AMAL CLOONEY TO BE ROYAL GODPARENTS – EXCLUSIVE

Meghan and Harry are getting so close with Hollywood royalty, George and Amal Clooney, that the Duke and Duchess have asked their new best friends if they would consider being godparents when the little baby arrives.

“Meghan and Harry have made it no secret that they both want children as soon as possible and although no official baby news has been announced yet, the couple have already signed up George and Amal as future godparents, once again shaking Royal norms,” sources tell STRAIGHT SHUTER. “The four of them have become very close and the royal couple have vacationed with the Clooney’s in Italy. This is now the circle that Meghan mixes with. Lots of her old friends have disappeared.”

MATT DAMON DUMPS BEN AFFLECK! – EXCLUSIVE

While Ben Affleck fights his demons in rehab, one friend who will not be by his side is Matt Damon.

“Matt will always love Ben and think of him like a brother but sometimes you have to step away to let people save themselves. The two of them are not as close anymore. Matt is focused on his wife and family and put his party days well behind him. While Ben is still living the fast life,” sources tell STRAIGHT SHUTER. “They have a long history together and will always have each other’s backs, but at the moment they don’t talk a lot or even see that much of each other anymore. This is something that Ben needs to do alone.”

Don't Miss Your Weekly Dose of The Fresh Toast.

Stay informed with exclusive news briefs delivered directly to your inbox every Friday.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.